Do You Really Need a Long Exclusivity Period to Sell Your Property?

When selling a property, one of the first documents you’ll be asked to sign is an agency agreement. Buried within it is usually a clause committing you to a long exclusivity period — often 12, 16 or even 20 weeks.

Many sellers accept this as standard. Few stop to ask whether it actually benefits them.

In practice, exclusivity periods exist for a reason — but longer is not always better.

What is an exclusivity period meant to do?

An exclusivity period gives an agent confidence that they will be paid if they invest time, marketing and effort into selling your property. That is entirely reasonable.

Good photography, portal listings, buyer qualification and sale progression all require commitment from the agent. Exclusivity provides protection for that investment.

The question is not whether exclusivity is appropriate — but how long it genuinely needs to be.

What actually happens in the first few weeks of marketing

In today’s market, the most important phase of a sale happens early.

• Professional photography is completed within days

• Listings go live across the major portals almost immediately

• Serious buyers tend to appear in the first 2–4 weeks

• Pricing feedback becomes clear very quickly

By six weeks, a seller usually knows whether the strategy is working.

If an agent has not generated meaningful interest by that point, a longer lock-in rarely changes the outcome. It simply removes the seller’s ability to adapt.

Why long lock-ins became common

Long exclusivity periods are not about better results — they are about certainty for the agent.

In high-volume agencies, long lock-ins help manage pipeline risk. If listings underperform, the contract still prevents the seller from moving elsewhere.

That structure may suit the agent’s business model, but it does not always suit the seller.

Shorter exclusivity doesn’t mean less commitment

A shorter exclusivity period does not reduce effort — it increases accountability.

An agent who knows they must perform within a defined timeframe is incentivised to:

• Price accurately from the outset

• Invest properly in marketing

• Communicate clearly and early

• Progress offers decisively

If an agent believes in their service, they should not need an extended lock-in to demonstrate value.

What sellers should look for instead

Rather than focusing on the length of exclusivity, sellers should ask:

• How quickly will marketing go live?

• How is pricing advice justified?

• How are buyers vetted and followed up?

• Who handles progression once an offer is agreed?

• What happens if the strategy needs to change?

Control, transparency and flexibility matter more than contractual duration.

A more balanced approach

At Hermens, we believe exclusivity should be fair, proportionate and aligned with how property transactions actually work.

Shorter exclusivity periods give sellers confidence without removing control. Results should come from quality of service — not contractual lock-ins.

Selling a property is a major decision. Your agreement should support that, not restrict it.